21st Century Learning — A Quarter Past

As we transition into 2025, I grapple with a surreal realization: we’re officially a quarter of the way through the 21st century. The number 2025 once felt like a far-off and ridiculous concept. Time has passed, time that has changed education, and time that reminds me — as much as I hate to admit it — that I’m officially old.

I vividly remember closing my classroom for the holiday break while the world shared concerns about Y2K — the impending doom that would accompany the turn of the millennium. For those of you who weren’t around then (or were too young to remember), Y2K was when we were led to believe that the world might come to a screeching halt because computers couldn’t handle the date rolling over to the new century. It was a time of chaos, confusion, and unnecessary stockpiling.

Can we finally agree to stop the persistent use of the phrase “21st-century learners”? It felt innovative and forward-thinking when mission statements and educational goals adopted this language in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Preparing students for the 21st century made sense. After all, it was the future we were rapidly approaching. But now, here we are, a quarter of the way through that future, and I still see the term popping up. When do we decide to move beyond this catchphrase and assess whether we’ve done our job?

The term encompassed skills like critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and communication — all essential for navigating a rapidly changing, globalized world. Technology integration was a massive part of it, too. Schools began prioritizing digital literacy, coding, and STEM education, preparing students for careers that didn’t yet exist. I remember when bringing laptops into classrooms was considered revolutionary, and now, many schools operate in 1:1 environments, where every student has their device. These changes were significant, and they’ve undoubtedly shaped the way education looks today.

But have we achieved what we set out to do? Research offers a mixed verdict. While technology integration has improved students’ access to information and their ability to collaborate, it hasn’t necessarily translated to better critical thinking skills. Similarly, the emphasis on STEM has created a talent pipeline for tech industries, but often at the expense of arts and humanities, which are equally important for fostering creativity and empathy. This imbalance suggests that while we’ve made strides, there’s still work to be done.

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of our approach to 21st-century learning. Remote and hybrid learning models showcased technology’s power but highlighted disparities in access and the challenges of maintaining engagement and collaboration in virtual spaces. These lessons remind us that “21st-century learning” isn’t just about the tools we use; it’s about how we use them to create meaningful, equitable learning experiences.

So, where do we go from here? If “21st-century learners” is no longer a meaningful goal, what should replace it? In an era of rapid technological advancement, adaptability is key. Students must be prepared for their first jobs and the many career shifts they will likely experience. They need resilience, cultural competence, and a strong moral compass to navigate a world as complex as it is interconnected.

As we move forward, I’d like to see education shift from preparing students for the “future” to empowering them in the present. Let’s stop framing learning as preparation for some distant goal and instead celebrate it as an ongoing journey. After all, we’re not just teaching 21st-century learners anymore; we’re living it.

Read more brief articles about public education from a former teacher, administrator, and recently retired superintendent on LinkedIn, Medium, WordPress, Substack, Blogger, Wix, X, or Instagram.